DFUV vs. VONE
DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. DFUV is actively managed, while VONE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 18.68%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for VONE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.
Performance
DFUV vs. VONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 8.46% return.
DFUV
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 32.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
DFUV vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 16.05% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | -0.71% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 8.46% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUV and VONE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DFUV and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUV vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUV
VONE
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFUV
VONE
Technology
DFUV
VONE
Healthcare
DFUV
VONE
Industrials
DFUV
VONE
Energy
DFUV
VONE
Consumer Cyclical
DFUV
VONE
Basic Materials
DFUV
VONE
Communication Services
DFUV
VONE
Consumer Defensive
DFUV
VONE
Real Estate
DFUV
VONE
Utilities
DFUV
VONE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUV vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank
DFUV
VONE
DFUV vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.36 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.51 | 2.73 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.90 | 12.47 | +7.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 1.98 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.84 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DFUV vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum VONE drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and VONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -34.66% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -8.85% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -19.06% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -2.59% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.90% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.93% | -0.27% |
Volatility
DFUV vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is 3.39%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that DFUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.68% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 9.37% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 12.22% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.12% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 18.27% | -2.02% |
DFUV vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUV vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison
DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VONE's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUV and VONE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VONE has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to DFUV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs VONE's -34.66%.
On 3-year performance, VONE leads with 21.14% vs 18.68% for DFUV. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VONE has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.
DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.01% for VONE.
DFUV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.08% for VONE.
DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUV and VONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer