PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUV vs. VONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUV vs. VONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 8.46% return.


DFUV

1D
0.64%
1M
2.84%
YTD
16.05%
6M
17.87%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10Y*

VONE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.42%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.48%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
21.14%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUV vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
16.05%15.77%11.79%13.25%-0.71%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
8.46%17.21%24.51%26.41%-5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUV and VONE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022

0.82

The correlation between DFUV and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUV vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUV
VONE

Financial Services

21.9%
11.9%

Technology

15.7%
33.9%

Healthcare

13.7%
8.7%

Industrials

13.6%
9.2%

Energy

12.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
10.3%

Basic Materials

6.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

5.1%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.2%

Utilities

0.1%
2.3%

Financial Services

DFUV
21.9%
VONE
11.9%

Technology

DFUV
15.7%
VONE
33.9%

Healthcare

DFUV
13.7%
VONE
8.7%

Industrials

DFUV
13.6%
VONE
9.2%

Energy

DFUV
12.9%
VONE
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUV
7.2%
VONE
10.3%

Basic Materials

DFUV
6.0%
VONE
2.0%

Communication Services

DFUV
5.1%
VONE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFUV
3.4%
VONE
4.8%

Real Estate

DFUV
0.4%
VONE
2.2%

Utilities

DFUV
0.1%
VONE
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUV vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUV
DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUV vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUVVONEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.36

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

2.73

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.90

12.47

+7.43

DFUV vs. VONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the VONE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUV and VONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUVVONEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

1.98

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.84

+0.04

Drawdowns

DFUV vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum VONE drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and VONE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUVVONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-34.66%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-8.85%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-19.06%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-2.59%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.90%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.93%

-0.27%

Volatility

DFUV vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is 3.39%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that DFUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUVVONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.68%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

9.37%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.22%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

17.12%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

18.27%

-2.02%

DFUV vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUV vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison

DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VONE's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
1.36%1.55%1.64%1.72%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUV and VONE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONE has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to DFUV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs VONE's -34.66%.

On 3-year performance, VONE leads with 21.14% vs 18.68% for DFUV. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VONE has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 18.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.

DFUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.01% for VONE.

DFUV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.08% for VONE.

DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUV and VONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer