PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUV vs. DFAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUV vs. DFAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 20.16% return, which is significantly higher than DFAI's 12.02% return.


DFUV

1D
0.22%
1M
1.35%
6M
14.55%
YTD
20.16%
1Y
34.64%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.13%

DFAI

1D
-0.64%
1M
1.25%
6M
6.62%
YTD
12.02%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$73.27M$69.05M$61.26M
$24.58M$21.37M$22.37M

DFUV vs. DFAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
20.16%15.77%11.79%13.25%-0.71%
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
12.02%34.04%4.68%17.60%-1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUV and DFAI is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022

0.75

The correlation between DFUV and DFAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUV vs. DFAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUV
DFAI

Financial Services

22.8%
23.1%

Healthcare

15.1%
8.8%

Technology

13.6%
11.1%

Industrials

12.8%
19.1%

Energy

12.1%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.4%

Utilities

0.1%
3.8%

Financial Services

DFUV
22.8%
DFAI
23.1%

Healthcare

DFUV
15.1%
DFAI
8.8%

Technology

DFUV
13.6%
DFAI
11.1%

Industrials

DFUV
12.8%
DFAI
19.1%

Energy

DFUV
12.1%
DFAI
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUV
7.5%
DFAI
8.6%

Basic Materials

DFUV
6.4%
DFAI
8.4%

Communication Services

DFUV
5.3%
DFAI
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFUV
3.6%
DFAI
6.4%

Real Estate

DFUV
0.3%
DFAI
1.4%

Utilities

DFUV
0.1%
DFAI
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUV vs. DFAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFUV
DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAI
DFAI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFUV vs. DFAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFUVDFAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.33

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

2.44

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.64

9.59

+11.04

DFUV vs. DFAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the DFAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUV and DFAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFUV vs. DFAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum DFAI drawdown of -27.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and DFAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUVDFAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-27.44%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-10.95%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-13.25%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.64%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-5.01%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.78%

-1.19%

Volatility

DFUV vs. DFAI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is 2.63%, while Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF (DFAI) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that DFUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUVDFAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.24%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

12.66%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

14.65%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.00%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

15.69%

+0.43%

DFUV vs. DFAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAI's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUV vs. DFAI - Dividend Comparison

DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DFAI's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAI
Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF
2.30%2.45%2.72%2.64%2.72%2.06%0.09%
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
1.30%1.55%1.64%1.72%1.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUV and DFAI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAI has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to DFUV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs DFAI's -27.44%.

On 3-year performance, DFAI leads with 17.83% vs 17.41% for DFUV. On fees, DFAI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAI has performed better with a 17.83% return vs 17.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.

DFAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.30% for DFUV.

DFUV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DFAI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.18% for DFAI.

DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUV and DFAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer