PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUSX vs. DFQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFUSX having a 11.70% return and DFQTX slightly higher at 12.21%. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX has outperformed DFQTX with an annualized return of 15.52%, while DFQTX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.12% annualized return.


DFUSX

1D
0.14%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
15.52%

DFQTX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.05%
YTD
12.21%
6M
12.50%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
11.70%17.76%24.91%26.28%-18.14%28.53%18.41%32.08%-4.45%21.04%
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
12.21%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUSX and DFQTX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2005

0.96

The correlation between DFUSX and DFQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUSX vs. DFQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUSX
DFUSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUSXDFQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.60

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.85

15.77

+0.09

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the DFQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUSX and DFQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUSXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.62

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.74

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.78

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.51

-0.05

Drawdowns

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, smaller than the maximum DFQTX drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and DFQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSXDFQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.96%

-59.35%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-8.47%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.71%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-22.64%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-37.21%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-7.78%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.92%

-0.04%

Volatility

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSXDFQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.94%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

8.90%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

11.67%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

16.99%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

18.26%

-0.19%

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFQTX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUSX vs. DFQTX - Dividend Comparison

DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, which matches DFQTX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
0.95%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
0.95%1.04%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.74%2.64%1.56%1.95%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFUSX and DFQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFQTX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to DFUSX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUSX dropped -54.96% vs DFQTX's -59.35%.

DFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUSX and DFQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer