DFUS vs. ZVNBX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and ZVNBX (Zevenbergen Growth Fund) are both funds - DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while ZVNBX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Zevenbergen. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ZVNBX.

Performance

DFUS vs. ZVNBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DFUS

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 1.45%
• 6M: 9.83%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.24%

ZVNBX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	$53.44M	$56.99M	$61.31M

DFUS vs. ZVNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	12.16%	17.46%	24.34%	26.36%	-18.34%	12.07%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	-0.07%	9.93%	34.10%	63.92%	-54.79%	-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and ZVNBX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021	0.81

The correlation between DFUS and ZVNBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFUS vs. ZVNBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFUS

DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 78
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ZVNBX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFUS vs. ZVNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Zevenbergen Growth Fund (ZVNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFUS	ZVNBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DFUS	ZVNBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFUS	ZVNBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.16%	—	—

DFUS vs. ZVNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVNBX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFUS vs. ZVNBX - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than ZVNBX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF	0.85%	0.88%	1.04%	1.33%	1.48%	0.85%	0.00%
ZVNBX Zevenbergen Growth Fund	1.27%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.95%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFUS and ZVNBX in my portfolio?

DFUS and ZVNBX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.