DFUS vs. OILK
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. DFUS is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUS returned 22.42%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
DFUS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 11.90% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between DFUS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFUS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
OILK
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
DFUS
OILK
-
Financial Services
DFUS
OILK
-
Technology
DFUS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
OILK
Industrials
DFUS
OILK
-
Energy
DFUS
OILK
-
Healthcare
DFUS
OILK
-
Utilities
DFUS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
DFUS
OILK
-
Real Estate
DFUS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
OILK
DFUS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.42 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 6.91 | +7.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.06 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.12 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -83.76% | +59.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -17.35% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -23.42% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -3.66% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -32.61% | +26.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 8.56% | -6.61% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) is 3.07%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that DFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 10.44% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 23.26% | -14.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 28.75% | -16.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 30.12% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 35.97% | -18.76% |
DFUS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFUS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUS and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.68% for OILK.
DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer