DFUS vs. DMAY
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFUS is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUS returned 22.42%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
DFUS vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUS vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 11.90% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 3.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and DMAY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DFUS and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUS vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
DMAY
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
DFUS
DMAY
Financial Services
DFUS
DMAY
Technology
DFUS
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
DMAY
Industrials
DFUS
DMAY
Energy
DFUS
DMAY
Healthcare
DFUS
DMAY
Utilities
DFUS
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
DMAY
Basic Materials
DFUS
DMAY
Real Estate
DFUS
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
DMAY
DFUS vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUS | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.73 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 22.76 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUS | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.65 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.88 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -13.90% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -3.36% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -12.38% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.30% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -2.24% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 0.55% | +1.40% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that DFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 0.84% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 3.74% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 4.73% | +7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 9.02% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 8.43% | +8.78% |
DFUS vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFUS vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DFUS and DMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFUS has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 11.96% for DMAY. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
DFUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer