PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUS vs. DFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUS vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.23% return.


DFUS

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.19%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUS vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.25%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%6.35%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and DFAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.76

The correlation between DFUS and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUS vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUS
DFAX

Communication Services

23.5%
3.5%

Financial Services

20.2%
17.9%

Technology

17.4%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.0%
10.9%

Industrials

9.5%
16.1%

Energy

5.3%
6.6%

Healthcare

4.1%
5.6%

Utilities

3.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
13.2%

Real Estate

0.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

DFUS
23.5%
DFAX
3.5%

Financial Services

DFUS
20.2%
DFAX
17.9%

Technology

DFUS
17.4%
DFAX
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUS
13.0%
DFAX
10.9%

Industrials

DFUS
9.5%
DFAX
16.1%

Energy

DFUS
5.3%
DFAX
6.6%

Healthcare

DFUS
4.1%
DFAX
5.6%

Utilities

DFUS
3.0%
DFAX
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFUS
2.6%
DFAX
3.9%

Basic Materials

DFUS
1.1%
DFAX
13.2%

Real Estate

DFUS
0.0%
DFAX
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUS vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUS vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUSDFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.16

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

12.50

+2.20

DFUS vs. DFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the DFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUS and DFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUSDFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.37

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.65

+0.14

Drawdowns

DFUS vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum DFAX drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and DFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSDFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-28.15%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-11.11%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-13.89%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.00%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-6.67%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.80%

-0.85%

Volatility

DFUS vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) is 3.07%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that DFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSDFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

5.27%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

12.67%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

14.83%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

15.99%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

15.99%

+1.22%

DFUS vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFUS vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than DFAX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.83%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUS and DFAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs DFAX's -28.15%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 20.90% for DFAX. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.

DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUS and DFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer