DFTT vs. SCHK
DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFTT tracks the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index while SCHK tracks the Schwab 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
DFTT vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 8.17% return.
DFTT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- —
DFTT vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 22.90% | -0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 8.17% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTT and SCHK is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025 | 0.84 |
DFTT vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFTT
SCHK
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFTT
SCHK
Communication Services
DFTT
SCHK
Financial Services
DFTT
SCHK
Industrials
DFTT
SCHK
Healthcare
DFTT
SCHK
Utilities
DFTT
SCHK
Basic Materials
DFTT
-
SCHK
Consumer Cyclical
DFTT
-
SCHK
Consumer Defensive
DFTT
-
SCHK
Energy
DFTT
-
SCHK
Real Estate
DFTT
-
SCHK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFTT vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
DFTT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHK
DFTT vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFTT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFTT vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -34.80% | +24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -3.31% | -1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -5.16% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.02% | — |
Volatility
DFTT vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFTT | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 12.82% | +11.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 17.34% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 19.12% | +4.72% |
DFTT vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFTT vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFTT and SCHK have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.
DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while SCHK tracks Schwab 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.03% for SCHK.
Find the right allocation for DFTT and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer