PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFTT vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFTT vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.78% return.


DFTT

1D
-3.68%
1M
-6.57%
6M
13.63%
YTD
17.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.45%
6M
4.38%
YTD
4.78%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DFTT
DF Tactical 30 ETF
17.89%-0.00%
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
4.78%1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and BUFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFTT vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFTT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BUFX
BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFTT vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFTTBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.88

DFTT vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFTTBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-2.87%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-0.11%

-8.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-0.24%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

Volatility

DFTT vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFTTBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.69%

4.02%

+21.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.69%

3.96%

+21.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.69%

3.96%

+21.73%

DFTT vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFTT vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

DFTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DFTT and BUFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFTT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFTT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

DFTT has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

DFTT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFTT and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer