DFSI vs. GMOI
DFSI (Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFSI is actively managed, while GMOI is passively managed. Over the past year, DFSI returned 17.86% vs 35.21% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSI charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
DFSI vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.52% return.
DFSI
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 35.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSI vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 4.33% | 33.62% | -3.95% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 11.52% | 45.64% | -4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSI and GMOI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DFSI and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSI vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
DFSI
GMOI
DFSI vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSI | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 4.23 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 16.65 | -11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSI vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum GMOI drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSI | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -14.67% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -8.36% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -2.63% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -1.69% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 2.12% | +1.16% |
Volatility
DFSI vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.99%. This indicates that DFSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSI | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 3.99% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.46% | 10.67% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 13.40% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 15.57% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.37% | 15.57% | -0.20% |
DFSI vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSI vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than GMOI's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 0.18% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.45% | 2.74% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSI and GMOI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSI has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to GMOI (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs GMOI's -14.67%.
On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 35.21% vs 17.86% for DFSI. On fees, DFSI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 35.21% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.17% for DFSI.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSI and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer