PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSHX vs. VTIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund (VTIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSHX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than VTIBX's 0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has outperformed VTIBX with an annualized return of 2.14%, while VTIBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.


DFSHX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
2.14%

VTIBX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.54%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.62%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%
VTIBX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund
0.60%2.98%3.84%8.86%-12.97%-2.27%4.56%7.76%3.00%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSHX and VTIBX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, DFSHX and VTIBX have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSHX vs. VTIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VTIBX
VTIBX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VTIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund (VTIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSHXVTIBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

0.72

+2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

1.03

+3.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.13

+0.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.76

+2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

2.13

+12.50

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the VTIBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSHX and VTIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSHXVTIBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

0.72

+2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.10

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.47

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.70

-0.21

Drawdowns

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum VTIBX drawdown of -16.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and VTIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSHXVTIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-16.15%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-2.95%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.18%

-2.95%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.58%

-15.81%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-16.15%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.26%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-3.07%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.05%

-0.75%

Volatility

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) is 0.70%, while Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund (VTIBX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that DFSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSHXVTIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

1.42%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

2.63%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

3.12%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.37%

4.49%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.65%

3.66%

-1.01%

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSHX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIBX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSHX vs. VTIBX - Dividend Comparison

DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than VTIBX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
VTIBX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund
4.43%4.33%4.31%4.37%1.41%3.68%1.06%3.36%2.98%2.21%1.76%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSHX and VTIBX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTIBX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to DFSHX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSHX dropped -9.58% vs VTIBX's -16.15%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSHX and VTIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer