PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSHX vs. VTABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSHX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than VTABX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has outperformed VTABX with an annualized return of 1.99%, while VTABX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.


DFSHX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
1.99%
ALL TIME*
1.47%

VTABX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.78%
6M
-0.15%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.57%
ALL TIME*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.62%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.26%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSHX and VTABX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.40

Over the past year, DFSHX and VTABX have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSHX vs. VTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSHXVTABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.08

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.50

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

1.26

+9.39

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the VTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSHX and VTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum VTABX drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and VTABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSHXVTABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-16.16%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-2.90%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.18%

-2.90%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.58%

-15.81%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-16.16%

+6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.59%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-3.02%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

1.14%

-0.81%

Volatility

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) is 0.58%, while Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that DFSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSHXVTABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.86%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

2.69%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65%

3.11%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.38%

4.46%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

3.61%

-0.97%

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSHX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VTABX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSHX vs. VTABX - Dividend Comparison

DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than VTABX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.28%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSHX and VTABX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTABX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to DFSHX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSHX dropped -9.58% vs VTABX's -16.16%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSHX and VTABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer