PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTABX vs. SWAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTABX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than SWAGX's 0.38% return.


VTABX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.45%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
1.83%

SWAGX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.74%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.08%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.92%
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.38%7.11%1.38%5.46%-13.62%-2.29%7.39%8.64%-0.11%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VTABX and SWAGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.73

The correlation between VTABX and SWAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTABX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

SWAGX
SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTABXSWAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.57

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

4.48

-2.30

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTABX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the SWAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTABX and SWAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTABX drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum SWAGX drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTABX and SWAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTABXSWAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-19.68%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-3.05%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.90%

-6.14%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

-18.76%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-3.38%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-5.67%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.07%

0.00%

Volatility

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) is 1.01%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that VTABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTABXSWAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.14%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.94%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

3.95%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

6.09%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

5.11%

-1.49%

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTABX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTABX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison

VTABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than SWAGX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.13%4.02%3.88%3.22%1.93%1.56%2.47%2.87%2.80%1.98%0.00%0.00%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.44%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTABX and SWAGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWAGX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to VTABX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTABX dropped -16.16% vs SWAGX's -19.68%.

SWAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTABX and SWAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer