DFSHX vs. SEBFX
DFSHX (DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio) and SEBFX (Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, DFSHX returned 2.02%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for SEBFX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFSHX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SEBFX.
Performance
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFSHX having a 1.41% return and SEBFX slightly lower at 1.38%. Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has underperformed SEBFX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while SEBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.
DFSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
SEBFX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSHX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 1.41% | 4.84% | 5.66% | 5.55% | -6.24% | -0.82% | 2.33% | 4.82% | 1.83% | 2.61% |
SEBFX Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund | 1.38% | 10.10% | -0.75% | 6.95% | -8.54% | -1.77% | 6.86% | 7.18% | -2.95% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSHX and SEBFX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.46 |
The correlation between DFSHX and SEBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSHX vs. SEBFX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSHX
SEBFX
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund (SEBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSHX | SEBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.33 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.93 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 6.58 | +5.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum SEBFX drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and SEBFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSHX | SEBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -13.51% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -3.01% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.18% | -5.51% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.58% | -13.26% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.58% | -13.51% | +3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.04% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -2.92% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.88% | -0.57% |
Volatility
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) is 0.66%, while Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund (SEBFX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that DFSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSHX | SEBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 0.99% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 2.92% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59% | 3.52% | -1.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.37% | 3.93% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.65% | 3.63% | -0.98% |
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSHX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SEBFX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSHX vs. SEBFX - Dividend Comparison
DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than SEBFX's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSHX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.20% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.90% | 0.04% | 1.77% | 0.03% | 2.52% | 3.23% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.11% |
SEBFX Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund | 3.84% | 3.89% | 3.28% | 3.68% | 0.65% | 2.61% | 0.89% | 2.60% | 3.05% | 2.75% | 2.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSHX and SEBFX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEBFX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to DFSHX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSHX dropped -9.58% vs SEBFX's -13.51%.
DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSHX and SEBFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer