DFSHX vs. DFGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX).
DFSHX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jan 8, 2008. DFGFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 8, 1996.
Performance
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSHX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.00% | 4.84% | 5.66% | 5.55% | -6.24% | -0.82% | 2.33% | 4.82% | 1.83% | 2.61% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.77% | 2.89% | 5.36% | 4.95% | -2.62% | -0.37% | 0.88% | 2.87% | 1.91% | 0.93% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.
DFSHX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
DFGFX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DFSHX and DFGFX have an expense ratio of 0.16%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DFSHX vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSHX
DFGFX
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSHX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.11 | 1.71 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.62 | 1.85 | +2.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 2.61 | -0.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.87 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | 5.76 | +8.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSHX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 1.71 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.19 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 1.29 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 2.27 | -1.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSHX and DFGFX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison
DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than DFGFX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSHX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.26% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.90% | 0.04% | 1.77% | 0.03% | 2.52% | 3.23% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.11% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.12% | 2.67% | 4.77% | 3.19% | 1.17% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 1.54% | 0.65% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and DFGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSHX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -4.00% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -1.41% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.58% | -4.00% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.58% | -4.00% | -5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | 0.00% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -0.23% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.46% | -0.21% |
Volatility
DFSHX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.22%. This indicates that DFSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFSHX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.22% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.94% | 0.44% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17% | 1.56% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 1.81% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.66% | 1.36% | +1.30% |