DFSE vs. UEVM
DFSE (Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. DFSE is actively managed, while UEVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSE returned 21.00%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for UEVM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSE charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for UEVM.
Performance
DFSE vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.
DFSE
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 42.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
DFSE vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 21.02% | 28.22% | 6.90% | 14.66% | 11.62% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSE and UEVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DFSE and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSE vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSE
UEVM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
DFSE
UEVM
Financial Services
DFSE
UEVM
Industrials
DFSE
UEVM
Consumer Cyclical
DFSE
UEVM
Basic Materials
DFSE
UEVM
Communication Services
DFSE
UEVM
Healthcare
DFSE
UEVM
Consumer Defensive
DFSE
UEVM
Real Estate
DFSE
UEVM
Utilities
DFSE
UEVM
Energy
DFSE
UEVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSE vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank
DFSE
UEVM
DFSE vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSE | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.56 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 8.65 | +3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSE | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.65 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.33 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
DFSE vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and UEVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSE | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -45.44% | +25.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -9.79% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -18.88% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -2.18% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -11.67% | +7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.89% | +0.56% |
Volatility
DFSE vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that DFSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSE | UEVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 5.15% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 12.13% | +4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 15.18% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 15.90% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.39% | -0.76% |
DFSE vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSE vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison
DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 1.84% | 2.26% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSE and UEVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSE has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs UEVM's -45.44%.
On 3-year performance, DFSE leads with 21.00% vs 18.34% for UEVM. On fees, DFSE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSE has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.84% for DFSE.
DFSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.45% for UEVM.
DFSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSE and UEVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer