PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return.


DFSE

1D
-1.66%
1M
5.84%
YTD
21.02%
6M
22.69%
1Y
42.80%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*

IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
21.02%28.22%6.90%14.66%11.62%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%6.50%11.52%10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and IEMG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022

0.96

The correlation between DFSE and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSE vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSE
IEMG

Technology

31.2%
35.0%

Financial Services

13.9%
18.4%

Industrials

12.5%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.5%

Basic Materials

6.2%
6.9%

Communication Services

5.8%
6.4%

Healthcare

4.7%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.7%

Utilities

1.8%
2.2%

Energy

1.0%
3.8%

Technology

DFSE
31.2%
IEMG
35.0%

Financial Services

DFSE
13.9%
IEMG
18.4%

Industrials

DFSE
12.5%
IEMG
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSE
10.6%
IEMG
9.5%

Basic Materials

DFSE
6.2%
IEMG
6.9%

Communication Services

DFSE
5.8%
IEMG
6.4%

Healthcare

DFSE
4.7%
IEMG
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

DFSE
3.9%
IEMG
3.3%

Real Estate

DFSE
2.2%
IEMG
1.7%

Utilities

DFSE
1.8%
IEMG
2.2%

Energy

DFSE
1.0%
IEMG
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

4.00

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

15.38

-2.93

DFSE vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.72

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.35

+0.98

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-38.71%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-13.21%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-17.21%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-1.34%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-12.97%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

3.43%

+0.02%

Volatility

DFSE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 7.93% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSEIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

8.31%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

16.93%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

19.43%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

18.38%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

20.03%

-2.40%

DFSE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than IEMG's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
1.84%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFSE and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DFSE (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 3-year performance, IEMG leads with 23.55% vs 21.00% for DFSE. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFSE.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.84% for DFSE.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSE and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer