DFSE vs. IEMG
DFSE (Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. DFSE is actively managed, while IEMG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSE returned 21.00%/yr vs 23.55%/yr for IEMG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSE charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
DFSE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return.
DFSE
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 42.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 52.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
DFSE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 21.02% | 28.22% | 6.90% | 14.66% | 11.62% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 26.21% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | 10.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSE and IEMG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DFSE and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSE vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSE
IEMG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
DFSE
IEMG
Financial Services
DFSE
IEMG
Industrials
DFSE
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
DFSE
IEMG
Basic Materials
DFSE
IEMG
Communication Services
DFSE
IEMG
Healthcare
DFSE
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
DFSE
IEMG
Real Estate
DFSE
IEMG
Utilities
DFSE
IEMG
Energy
DFSE
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
DFSE
IEMG
DFSE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 4.00 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 15.38 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.72 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.35 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
DFSE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -38.71% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -13.21% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -17.21% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.34% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -12.97% | +8.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.43% | +0.02% |
Volatility
DFSE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 7.93% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 8.31% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 16.93% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 19.43% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.38% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 20.03% | -2.40% |
DFSE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than IEMG's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 1.84% | 2.26% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, DFSE and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DFSE (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 3-year performance, IEMG leads with 23.55% vs 21.00% for DFSE. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFSE.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.84% for DFSE.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSE and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer