DFSE vs. CAOS
DFSE (Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSE returned 21.00%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for CAOS. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFSE charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
DFSE vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.
DFSE
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 22.69%
- 1Y
- 42.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSE vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 21.02% | 28.22% | 6.90% | 9.08% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.82% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSE and CAOS is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between DFSE and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFSE vs. CAOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSE
CAOS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
DFSE
CAOS
Financial Services
DFSE
CAOS
Industrials
DFSE
CAOS
Consumer Cyclical
DFSE
CAOS
Basic Materials
DFSE
CAOS
Communication Services
DFSE
CAOS
Healthcare
DFSE
CAOS
Consumer Defensive
DFSE
CAOS
Real Estate
DFSE
CAOS
Utilities
DFSE
CAOS
Energy
DFSE
CAOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSE vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
DFSE
CAOS
DFSE vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 2.49 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.45 | 6.22 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.24 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
DFSE vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -3.60% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -0.76% | -12.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -3.60% | -16.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.07% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -0.90% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 0.30% | +3.15% |
Volatility
DFSE vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) has a higher volatility of 7.93% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that DFSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSE | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 0.26% | +7.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 1.03% | +15.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 1.52% | +17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 4.26% | +13.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 4.26% | +13.37% |
DFSE vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSE vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFSE Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 1.84% | 2.26% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSE and CAOS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSE has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSE dropped -19.77% vs CAOS's -3.60%.
On 3-year performance, DFSE leads with 21.00% vs 4.26% for CAOS. On fees, DFSE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSE has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 4.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
DFSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
DFSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFSE and 0.63% for CAOS.
DFSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSE and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer