PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSE vs. BBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFSE vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFSE vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.27%28.22%6.90%9.60%
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.56%32.43%5.61%6.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSE achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly lower than BBEM's 3.56% return.


DFSE

1D
3.27%
1M
-8.75%
YTD
2.27%
6M
3.96%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
10Y*

BBEM

1D
3.57%
1M
-8.72%
YTD
3.56%
6M
8.15%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFSE vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSE has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFSE vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSE
DFSE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSE vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSEBBEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

1.65

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

2.27

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.43

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

9.61

-1.47

DFSE vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSE and BBEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSEBBEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.65

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.97

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between DFSE and BBEM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFSE vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

DFSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than BBEM's 5.63% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DFSE
Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF
2.18%2.26%2.06%2.06%0.36%
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
5.63%5.86%2.73%1.94%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFSE vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSE drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSE and BBEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSEBBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

-17.42%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-13.12%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.03%

-10.02%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.80%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

3.32%

+0.10%

Volatility

DFSE vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSE) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) have volatilities of 9.85% and 10.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFSEBBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

10.26%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

14.66%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.20%

19.77%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

16.71%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

16.71%

+0.38%