PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSD vs. SPTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSD vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSD achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than SPTS's 0.48% return.


DFSD

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.39%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
10Y*

SPTS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSD vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
0.22%6.59%4.60%6.09%-5.87%-0.05%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.48%5.05%4.20%4.27%-3.86%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSD and SPTS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

0.75

The correlation between DFSD and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSD vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSD
DFSD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DFSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSD vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSDSPTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.66

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

14.26

-5.78

DFSD vs. SPTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSD and SPTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSD vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSD drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, which is greater than SPTS's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSD and SPTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSDSPTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-5.83%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-0.84%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-0.96%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.24%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-1.72%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.22%

+0.17%

Volatility

DFSD vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.46%. This indicates that DFSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSDSPTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.46%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

0.93%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

1.33%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.78%

1.99%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.78%

1.70%

+1.08%

DFSD vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSD vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

DFSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than SPTS's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
3.99%4.12%4.81%3.89%2.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSD and SPTS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSD has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to SPTS (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSD dropped -8.45% vs SPTS's -5.83%.

On 3-year performance, DFSD leads with 5.16% vs 4.25% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFSD has performed better with a 5.16% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DFSD.

DFSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.91% for SPTS.

DFSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DFSD and 0.03% for SPTS.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSD and SPTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer