DFSCX vs. VT
DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - DFSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX returned 11.87%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSCX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
DFSCX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.87%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.
DFSCX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 18.44%
- 1Y
- 38.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
DFSCX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 20.66% | 9.65% | 11.43% | 17.93% | -12.49% | 33.70% | 6.61% | 20.68% | -11.60% | 10.92% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSCX and VT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DFSCX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSCX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
DFSCX
VT
DFSCX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSCX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 2.67 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.06 | 11.57 | +4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSCX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSCX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.07% | -50.27% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -9.67% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.01% | -16.51% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.01% | -26.38% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.88% | -34.24% | -12.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.80% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -7.00% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.23% | +0.28% |
Volatility
DFSCX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) is 4.54%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that DFSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSCX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.65% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 11.32% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.75% | 13.58% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 16.19% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 17.20% | +5.46% |
DFSCX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSCX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 0.79% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 2.48% | 5.16% | 10.77% | 0.87% | 2.80% | 5.50% | 5.05% | 0.90% | 6.33% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSCX and VT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to DFSCX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSCX dropped -63.07% vs VT's -50.27%.
DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSCX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer