PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSCX vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 11.53%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


DFSCX

1D
2.35%
1M
6.42%
YTD
19.26%
6M
16.19%
1Y
38.65%
3Y*
17.49%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.53%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
19.26%9.65%11.43%17.93%-12.49%33.70%6.61%20.68%-11.60%10.92%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSCX and SPEM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.65

The correlation between DFSCX and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSCX vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSCX
DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSCXSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.28

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

8.16

+5.96

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSCX and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSCXSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.07%

-64.41%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.36%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-17.62%

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-31.75%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-36.06%

-10.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.40%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-14.73%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.17%

-0.64%

Volatility

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) is 5.02%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that DFSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSCXSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

6.87%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

14.21%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

16.67%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.05%

17.26%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.65%

18.83%

+3.82%

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSCX vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
0.80%1.03%0.97%2.48%5.16%10.77%0.87%2.80%5.50%5.05%0.90%6.33%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSCX and SPEM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to DFSCX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSCX dropped -63.07% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSCX and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer