DFS vs. LULU
DFS (Discover Financial Services) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. DFS operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFS vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -51.92%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
DFS vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFS Discover Financial Services | 0.00% | 15.88% | 57.32% | 18.20% | -13.55% | 29.78% | 10.13% | 46.94% | -21.80% | 8.92% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFS and LULU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.33 |
The correlation between DFS and LULU shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DFS:
$10.25B
LULU:
$11.20B
DFS:
$7.81B
LULU:
$6.24B
DFS:
$4.40B
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFS vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
DFS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LULU
DFS vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Discover Financial Services (DFS) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFS | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFS vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFS | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -92.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -77.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -76.77% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.61% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.26% | — |
Volatility
DFS vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFS | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 42.22% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 40.62% | — |
Dividends
DFS vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFS nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFS Discover Financial Services | 0.00% | 0.35% | 1.62% | 2.40% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 1.94% | 1.98% | 2.54% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 2.01% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DFS vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Discover Financial Services and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DFS and LULU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DFS and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer