DFRA vs. KWIN
DFRA (Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - DFRA tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index - Benchmark TR Net while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFRA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
DFRA vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFRA achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.72% return.
DFRA
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 8.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFRA vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF | 6.16% | 2.74% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.72% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFRA and KWIN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFRA vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
DFRA
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFRA vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFRA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFRA vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFRA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRA and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFRA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.35% | -1.50% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -1.32% | -8.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -0.26% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.64% | — | — |
Volatility
DFRA vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFRA | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.01% | 4.15% | +10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 4.15% | +13.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 4.15% | +13.28% |
DFRA vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFRA vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
DFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF | 3.62% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFRA and KWIN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.
DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
DFRA tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index - Benchmark TR Net, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFRA and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for DFRA and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer