DFRA vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFRA (Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFRA is passively managed, while FUNL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFRA returned 12.75%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for FUNL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFRA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

DFRA vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFRA achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

DFRA

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFRA vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	8.60%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	-5.76%	3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DFRA and FUNL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between DFRA and FUNL has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFRA vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFRA	FUNL
Industrials	35.7%	11.5%
Energy	26.3%	7.6%
Basic Materials	18.5%	2.2%
Real Estate	12.1%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	7.0%
Utilities	2.8%	5.0%
Technology	1.5%	14.6%
Communication Services	-	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.5%
Financial Services	-	19.3%
Healthcare	-	15.3%

Return for Risk

DFRA vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFRA

DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 29
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFRA vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFRA	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	2.19	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	3.26	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.47	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	5.01	-3.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	23.31	-18.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFRA vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFRA and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFRA	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	2.19	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.95	-0.27

Drawdowns

DFRA vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFRA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRA and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFRA	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-19.35%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-3.83%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-17.37%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.31%	-0.12%	-7.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-3.54%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	0.82%	+2.54%

Volatility

DFRA vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFRA	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	0.00%	+4.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	5.24%	+7.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	8.82%	+5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.52%	15.16%	+2.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	15.29%	+2.23%

DFRA vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFRA vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

DFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	4.20%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFRA and FUNL in my portfolio?

DFRA and FUNL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFRA or FUNL?

DFRA has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFRA dropped -19.35% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, DFRA or FUNL?

On 3-year performance, FUNL leads with 16.53% vs 12.75% for DFRA. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFRA or FUNL?

Over the 3-year period, FUNL has performed better with a 16.53% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFRA or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFRA or FUNL?

DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.25% for FUNL.

What is the main difference between DFRA and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFRA and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.