PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFRA vs. ELCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFRA vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFRA achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.17% return.


DFRA

1D
-1.53%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
5.85%
6M
5.88%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
10Y*

ELCV

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.27%
YTD
21.17%
6M
21.89%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFRA vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
5.85%6.64%-4.96%
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
21.17%9.96%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DFRA and ELCV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.77

The correlation between DFRA and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFRA vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFRA
DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ELCV
ELCV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ELCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ELCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFRA vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFRAELCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

6.30

-5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

22.05

-18.99

DFRA vs. ELCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the ELCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFRA and ELCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFRA vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFRA drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than ELCV's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRA and ELCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFRAELCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-18.38%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-5.05%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.66%

-1.32%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.68%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

1.44%

+2.37%

Volatility

DFRA vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) at 4.25%. This indicates that DFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFRAELCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.25%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

9.13%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

11.84%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

15.45%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

15.45%

+2.07%

DFRA vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFRA vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison

DFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than ELCV's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFRA
Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF
4.31%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%
ELCV
Eventide High Dividend ETF
1.76%2.34%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFRA and ELCV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFRA has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to ELCV (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFRA dropped -19.35% vs ELCV's -18.38%.

On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 31.68% vs 11.62% for DFRA. On fees, ELCV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ELCV has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 31.68% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ELCV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.

DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 1.76% for ELCV.

They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFRA and 0.49% for ELCV.

ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFRA and ELCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer