PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNX.L is traded in GBp, while GJGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GJGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNX.L achieves a 37.35% return, which is significantly higher than GJGB.L's -1.48% return.


DFNX.L

1D
1.81%
1M
15.11%
YTD
37.35%
6M
40.02%
1Y
78.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GJGB.L

1D
0.69%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
6.58%
1Y
66.00%
3Y*
42.48%
5Y*
18.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFNX.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
37.35%45.07%9.49%
GJGB.L
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF
-1.48%156.51%-11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNX.L and GJGB.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNX.L
DFNX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DFNX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GJGB.L
GJGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GJGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GJGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNX.LGJGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.24

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.41

2.18

+4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.60

5.30

+11.30

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNX.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the GJGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNX.L and GJGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNX.LGJGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

1.43

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.60

0.40

+2.20

Drawdowns

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNX.L drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum GJGB.L drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNX.L and GJGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNX.LGJGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-49.12%

+33.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-29.95%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-27.14%

+23.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-22.35%

+18.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

12.37%

-7.69%

Volatility

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) is 9.23%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GJGB.L) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that DFNX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GJGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNX.LGJGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

16.00%

-6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

36.81%

-17.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

45.62%

-21.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

36.94%

-12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

36.80%

-12.08%

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFNX.L and GJGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

DFNX.L vs. GJGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNX.L nor GJGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNX.L and GJGB.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFNX.L and GJGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

DFNX.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while GJGB.L is Gold. DFNX.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while GJGB.L tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNX.L and GJGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer