PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) and Drone UCITS ETF Acc (DRON.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNX.L is traded in GBp, while DRON.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRON.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


DFNX.L

1D
-1.79%
1M
13.81%
YTD
34.91%
6M
42.66%
1Y
76.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRON.L

1D
-6.88%
1M
17.72%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
DFNX.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
14.82%
DRON.L
Drone UCITS ETF Acc
-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNX.L and DRON.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNX.L
DFNX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFNX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DRON.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) and Drone UCITS ETF Acc (DRON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNX.LDRON.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.40

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNX.LDRON.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.53

-0.07

+2.60

Drawdowns

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNX.L drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum DRON.L drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNX.L and DRON.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNX.LDRON.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-31.69%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-10.24%

+5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-17.34%

+13.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

Volatility

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNX.LDRON.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

68.73%

-44.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

68.73%

-44.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

68.73%

-44.01%

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNX.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DRON.L's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNX.L nor DRON.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNX.L and DRON.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFNX.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFNX.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DRON.L.

DFNX.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while DRON.L tracks VettaFi Drones UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNX.L and 0.69% for DRON.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNX.L and DRON.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer