DFNX.L vs. DRON.L
DFNX.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) and DRON.L (Drone UCITS ETF Acc) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - DFNX.L tracks the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index while DRON.L tracks the VettaFi Drones UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNX.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DRON.L.
Performance
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DFNX.L is traded in GBp, while DRON.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRON.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
DFNX.L
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 34.91%
- 6M
- 42.66%
- 1Y
- 76.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRON.L
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- 17.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFNX.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 14.82% |
DRON.L Drone UCITS ETF Acc | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNX.L and DRON.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L — Risk / Return Rank
DFNX.L
DRON.L
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNX.L) and Drone UCITS ETF Acc (DRON.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNX.L | DRON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.33 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNX.L | DRON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.53 | -0.07 | +2.60 |
Drawdowns
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNX.L drawdown since its inception was -15.39%, smaller than the maximum DRON.L drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNX.L and DRON.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNX.L | DRON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -31.69% | +16.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.07% | -10.24% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -17.34% | +13.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNX.L | DRON.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 68.73% | -44.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 68.73% | -44.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 68.73% | -44.01% |
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNX.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DRON.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNX.L vs. DRON.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFNX.L nor DRON.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNX.L and DRON.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFNX.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFNX.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DRON.L.
DFNX.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while DRON.L tracks VettaFi Drones UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNX.L and 0.69% for DRON.L.
Find the right allocation for DFNX.L and DRON.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer