GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (GJGB.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L).
GJGB.L and SGLS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GJGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. SGLS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Gold (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Jul 9, 2020. Both GJGB.L and SGLS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GJGB.L or SGLS.L.
Key characteristics
| GJGB.L | SGLS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.61% | 24.60% |
| 1Y Return | 34.10% | 32.23% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.07% | 10.03% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.88 | 2.20 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.39 | 2.86 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.66 | 3.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.81 | 13.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.27% | 2.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.74% | 13.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.12% | -23.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.84% | -6.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GJGB.L and SGLS.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GJGB.L achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than SGLS.L's 24.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GJGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLS.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (GJGB.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GJGB.L nor SGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GJGB.L drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, which is greater than SGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJGB.L and SGLS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GJGB.L vs. SGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (GJGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) at 6.70%. This indicates that GJGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.