DFNM vs. MYMG
DFNM (Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF) and MYMG (State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFNM returned 5.29% vs 3.89% for MYMG. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNM charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MYMG.
Performance
DFNM vs. MYMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than MYMG's 1.20% return.
DFNM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNM vs. MYMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 1.29% | 3.87% | -0.44% |
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 2.64% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNM and MYMG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between DFNM and MYMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNM vs. MYMG — Risk / Return Rank
DFNM
MYMG
DFNM vs. MYMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.03 | 4.80 | -1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | 8.05 | -3.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 2.38 | -0.69 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 10.94 | -8.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 36.03 | -25.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 4.80 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.07 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
DFNM vs. MYMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNM drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than MYMG's maximum drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNM and MYMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -2.31% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.84% | -0.36% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -0.33% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.11% | +0.40% |
Volatility
DFNM vs. MYMG - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) has a higher volatility of 0.58% compared to State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMG) at 0.18%. This indicates that DFNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 0.18% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.29% | 0.56% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 0.81% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 2.03% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 2.03% | +0.51% |
DFNM vs. MYMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNM has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MYMG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFNM vs. MYMG - Dividend Comparison
DFNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, which matches MYMG's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 2.89% | 2.94% | 2.74% | 2.39% | 1.16% | 0.05% |
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.88% | 3.03% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNM and MYMG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFNM has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to MYMG (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNM dropped -6.99% vs MYMG's -2.31%.
On 1-year performance, DFNM leads with 5.29% vs 3.89% for MYMG. On fees, DFNM is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, MYMG has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFNM has performed better with a 5.29% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFNM is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMG.
DFNM and MYMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.89%.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFNM and 0.20% for MYMG.
MYMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFNM and MYMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer