PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DFNL vs. KBWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DFNL vs. KBWP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFNL (Davis Select Financial ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. DFNL is actively managed, while KBWP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFNL returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for KBWP. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNL charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.

Performance

DFNL vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNL achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -1.94% return.

DFNL

1D
0.44%
1M
4.11%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-1.01%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
—

KBWP

1D
2.46%
1M
2.63%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
12.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNL vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFNL
Davis Select Financial ETF		0.04%28.59%28.56%14.45%-8.45%31.25%-4.97%27.37%-11.59%20.34%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		-1.94%11.49%30.45%7.09%10.16%20.61%-2.05%28.67%-2.76%9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNL and KBWP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between DFNL and KBWP has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFNL vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DFNL
KBWP

Financial Services

93.1%
100.0%

Technology

3.3%

-

Industrials

2.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DFNL
93.1%
KBWP
100.0%

Technology

DFNL
3.3%
KBWP

-

Industrials

DFNL
2.7%
KBWP

-

Consumer Cyclical

DFNL
1.0%
KBWP

-

Basic Materials

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Communication Services

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Consumer Defensive

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Energy

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Healthcare

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Real Estate

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Utilities

DFNL

-

KBWP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Davis Select Financial ETF

Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF

Often compared with DFNL:
DFNL vs. VFHDFNL vs. FLBLDFNL vs. FTXODFNL vs. XLFDFNL vs. EUFNDFNL vs. SPMODFNL vs. BPAY
Often compared with KBWP:
KBWP vs. IAKKBWP vs. KIEKBWP vs. KBEKBWP vs. ACGLKBWP vs. PSCFKBWP vs. TRVKBWP vs. VOO

Return for Risk

DFNL vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DFNL
DFNL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
KBWP
KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNL vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DFNLKBWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
0.15

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.71
0.32

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.04

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.26

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

0.56

+3.27

DFNL vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNL and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNL vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNL drawdown since its inception was -44.51%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNL and KBWP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DFNLKBWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.51%

-39.76%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-9.56%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.05%

-12.29%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.27%

-17.00%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-39.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-2.75%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-4.37%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

4.36%

+0.21%

Volatility

DFNL vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) is 4.08%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that DFNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DFNLKBWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

5.82%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

12.07%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

16.60%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.54%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

20.73%

+1.85%

DFNL vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNL vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

DFNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than KBWP's 2.00% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFNL
Davis Select Financial ETF		1.37%1.37%2.19%2.33%3.34%2.45%1.45%2.52%3.12%1.10%0.00%0.00%
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF		2.00%1.58%1.64%1.68%1.99%3.02%1.93%1.99%2.11%1.90%2.14%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

DFNL and KBWP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWP has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to DFNL (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNL dropped -44.51% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

On 5-year performance, DFNL leads with 12.48% vs 12.41% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFNL has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DFNL.

KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.37% for DFNL.

They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for DFNL and 0.35% for KBWP.

DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNL and KBWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer