DFND vs. SPXM
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFND is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
DFND vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 0.44% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and SPXM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
DFND vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFND | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFND vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.75% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.78% | — |
Volatility
DFND vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.68% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 7.66% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 7.66% | — |
DFND vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and SPXM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for DFND and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer