DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
DFN.TO (Dividend 15 Split Corp.) is a stock, while ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) is Money Market fund actively managed by BMO. Over the past 3 years, DFN.TO returned 23.19%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for ZMMK.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFN.TO achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.95% return.
DFN.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- YTD
- 17.29%
- 6M
- 24.35%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. | 17.29% | 46.96% | 38.64% | -19.97% | 9.39% | 2.02% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.95% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFN.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DFN.TO
ZMMK.TO
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -19.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 5.45 | -3.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 82.88 | -77.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.76 | 377.25 | -350.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.94 | 9.66 | -5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 10.29 | -9.96 |
Drawdowns
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.88%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFN.TO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.88% | -0.16% | -73.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -0.03% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.72% | -0.08% | -53.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.02% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -0.00% | -11.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 0.01% | +2.31% |
Volatility
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that DFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFN.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.45% | 0.06% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 0.18% | +14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 0.26% | +15.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.87% | 0.34% | +25.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 0.34% | +29.93% |
Dividends
DFN.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
DFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.60%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. | 14.60% | 16.06% | 17.92% | 14.87% | 15.94% | 15.00% | 11.83% | 13.99% | 15.54% | 12.00% | 11.17% | 11.76% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.53% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFN.TO and ZMMK.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DFN.TO and ZMMK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer