PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLYX vs. OOSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLYX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than OOSAX's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DFLYX has outperformed OOSAX with an annualized return of 4.95%, while OOSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.63% annualized return.


DFLYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
4.95%

OOSAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
1.47%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFLYX
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund
1.81%4.84%9.77%13.29%-1.15%4.84%2.66%7.15%-0.58%3.48%
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
-0.83%3.78%7.76%10.67%-0.94%8.66%-4.46%2.36%-0.86%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLYX and OOSAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.45

The correlation between DFLYX and OOSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLYX vs. OOSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLYX
DFLYX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DFLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSAX
OOSAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
OOSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) and Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLYXOOSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.79

0.55

+3.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.30

1.13

+5.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.03

1.17

+0.87

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

0.51

+2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.15

1.13

+10.02

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.79, which is higher than the OOSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLYX and OOSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLYXOOSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79

0.55

+3.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.13

1.39

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.63

0.89

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.30

+0.23

Drawdowns

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLYX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum OOSAX drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLYX and OOSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLYXOOSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-32.12%

+13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-3.23%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.49%

-3.23%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.28%

-6.52%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.83%

-23.53%

+4.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.57%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-2.15%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.37%

-0.92%

Volatility

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund (DFLYX) is 0.31%, while Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund (OOSAX) has a volatility of 0.86%. This indicates that DFLYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OOSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLYXOOSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.86%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.14%

2.07%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

2.99%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.93%

3.61%

-1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.05%

4.13%

-1.08%

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLYX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFLYX vs. OOSAX - Dividend Comparison

DFLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than OOSAX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLYX
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund
7.82%7.50%8.78%8.78%5.49%4.22%4.66%5.54%5.19%3.77%4.14%4.65%
OOSAX
Invesco Senior Floating Rate Fund
5.18%6.68%8.38%7.76%7.42%4.37%4.84%5.24%4.65%4.08%4.78%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFLYX and OOSAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OOSAX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to DFLYX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLYX dropped -18.83% vs OOSAX's -32.12%.

DFLYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLYX and OOSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer