PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLVX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLVX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFLVX having a 11.82% annualized return and FBLEX not far ahead at 11.85%.


DFLVX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
14.74%
6M
17.76%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
11.82%

FBLEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.06%
YTD
8.01%
6M
10.46%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
14.74%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.01%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLVX and FBLEX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.96

The correlation between DFLVX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLVX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

2.17

+0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.37

3.12

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.39

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

3.30

+2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.61

13.39

+7.21

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLVX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

2.17

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.78

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.73

-0.20

Drawdowns

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLVX drawdown since its inception was -65.65%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLVX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.65%

-39.73%

-25.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-6.89%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-14.71%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.83%

-19.00%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.79%

-39.73%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.52%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-3.83%

-4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.70%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLVXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.74%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

7.90%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

10.51%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

14.79%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

17.40%

+0.98%

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFLVX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

DFLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FBLEX's 10.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.47%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.28%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFLVX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFLVX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to FBLEX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLVX dropped -65.65% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLVX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer