DFJ vs. ICSH
DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. DFJ is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFJ returned 9.18%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
DFJ vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 9.18%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
DFJ
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
DFJ vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 10.31% | 31.90% | 2.80% | 21.81% | -9.00% | 0.38% | 1.29% | 16.98% | -18.53% | 32.14% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.53% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFJ and ICSH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.09 |
The correlation between DFJ and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFJ vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFJ
ICSH
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
DFJ
ICSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFJ
ICSH
-
Basic Materials
DFJ
ICSH
-
Financial Services
DFJ
ICSH
-
Technology
DFJ
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
DFJ
ICSH
-
Healthcare
DFJ
ICSH
-
Real Estate
DFJ
ICSH
-
Utilities
DFJ
ICSH
Communication Services
DFJ
ICSH
-
Energy
DFJ
ICSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFJ vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
DFJ
ICSH
DFJ vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFJ | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 6.59 | -5.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 43.88 | -41.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 290.20 | -284.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFJ vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFJ | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -3.94% | -42.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -0.10% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -0.10% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -0.73% | -28.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | -3.94% | -36.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | 0.00% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -0.08% | -11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 0.01% | +4.60% |
Volatility
DFJ vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that DFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFJ | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 0.13% | +4.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 0.29% | +13.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.68% | 0.39% | +16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 0.48% | +15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 1.06% | +15.91% |
DFJ vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFJ vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.41% | 2.68% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.23% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFJ and ICSH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFJ has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, DFJ leads with 9.18% vs 2.78% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DFJ has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.41% for DFJ.
DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFJ and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer