PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJ vs. ICSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJ vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 9.18%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.


DFJ

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.99%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
9.18%

ICSH

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJ vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
10.31%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
1.53%4.96%5.52%5.58%0.97%0.16%1.61%3.17%2.25%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and ICSH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013

0.09

The correlation between DFJ and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFJ vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFJ
ICSH

Industrials

27.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%

-

Basic Materials

13.3%

-

Financial Services

13.3%

-

Technology

12.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Industrials

DFJ
27.0%
ICSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

DFJ
16.1%
ICSH

-

Basic Materials

DFJ
13.3%
ICSH

-

Financial Services

DFJ
13.3%
ICSH

-

Technology

DFJ
12.6%
ICSH

-

Consumer Defensive

DFJ
7.1%
ICSH

-

Healthcare

DFJ
4.1%
ICSH

-

Real Estate

DFJ
2.9%
ICSH

-

Utilities

DFJ
1.6%
ICSH
100.0%

Communication Services

DFJ
1.5%
ICSH

-

Energy

DFJ
0.6%
ICSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJ vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSH
ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJ vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFJICSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-25.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

6.59

-5.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

43.88

-41.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

290.20

-284.24

DFJ vs. ICSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the ICSH Sharpe Ratio of 10.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and ICSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and ICSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJICSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-3.94%

-42.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-0.10%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-0.10%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-0.73%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

-3.94%

-36.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

0.00%

-5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-0.08%

-11.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

0.01%

+4.60%

Volatility

DFJ vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that DFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJICSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

0.13%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

0.29%

+13.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

0.39%

+16.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

0.48%

+15.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

1.06%

+15.91%

DFJ vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJ vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.41%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.34%4.55%5.24%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJ and ICSH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFJ has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs ICSH's -3.94%.

On 10-year performance, DFJ leads with 9.18% vs 2.78% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DFJ has performed better with a 9.18% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 2.41% for DFJ.

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.08% for ICSH.

ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.98 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJ and ICSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer