PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJ vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJ vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 8.80%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.


DFJ

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.56%
6M
5.79%
YTD
12.43%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
8.80%
ALL TIME*
5.90%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$4.27M$3.89M$3.95M

DFJ vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
12.43%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and BNO is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

0.17

The correlation between DFJ and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJ vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFJ vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFJBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

1.70

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

5.15

+0.24

DFJ vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-87.06%

+41.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-34.46%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-34.46%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-34.46%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

-75.18%

+35.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-16.21%

+12.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-39.99%

+28.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

11.86%

-6.95%

Volatility

DFJ vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) is 6.34%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that DFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

17.47%

-11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

40.96%

-26.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

44.54%

-26.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

36.41%

-20.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

36.98%

-19.98%

DFJ vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJ vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.61%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJ and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to DFJ (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 15.06% vs 8.80% for DFJ. On fees, DFJ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFJ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. DFJ tracks WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 1.00% for BNO.

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJ and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer