PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIVX vs. RWJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIVX achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 16.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIVX has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 11.32%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.


DFIVX

1D
-2.30%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
10.28%
6M
13.96%
1Y
33.30%
3Y*
23.24%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
11.32%

RWJ

1D
0.78%
1M
1.37%
YTD
16.99%
6M
17.05%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIVX
DFA International Value Portfolio
10.28%45.24%6.87%17.83%-3.51%18.57%-2.13%15.68%-17.49%26.08%
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
16.99%7.75%11.81%16.21%-10.97%52.82%20.83%20.29%-16.95%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIVX and RWJ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008

0.69

The correlation between DFIVX and RWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIVX vs. RWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIVX
DFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RWJ
RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVXRWJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.25

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.92

10.40

+3.52

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the RWJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIVX and RWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVXRWJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.90

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.33

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.50

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Drawdowns

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIVX drawdown since its inception was -66.61%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIVX and RWJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVXRWJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.61%

-55.97%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-11.31%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.39%

-29.29%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-29.29%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.11%

-51.33%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-0.33%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.24%

-9.23%

-3.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

3.53%

-1.10%

Volatility

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) is 4.03%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that DFIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVXRWJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.80%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

12.38%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

19.43%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

23.72%

-7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

26.15%

-8.12%

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIVX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIVX vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison

DFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than RWJ's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIVX
DFA International Value Portfolio
3.82%4.21%3.94%4.40%3.78%4.37%2.42%3.70%6.60%2.85%3.36%3.45%
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
1.00%1.11%1.15%1.34%1.02%0.61%0.89%1.22%1.44%1.11%0.60%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIVX and RWJ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWJ has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to DFIVX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIVX dropped -66.61% vs RWJ's -55.97%.

DFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIVX and RWJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer