DFIVX vs. PG
DFIVX (DFA International Value Portfolio) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DFIVX returned 12.11%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFIVX vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIVX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIVX has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 12.11%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
DFIVX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
DFIVX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio | 11.58% | 45.24% | 6.87% | 17.83% | -3.51% | 18.57% | -2.13% | 15.68% | -17.49% | 26.08% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIVX and PG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 1994 | 0.26 |
The correlation between DFIVX and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIVX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
DFIVX
PG
DFIVX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFIVX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.97 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | -0.37 | +3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | -0.68 | +14.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFIVX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIVX drawdown since its inception was -66.61%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIVX and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIVX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.61% | -54.25% | -12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -15.52% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.39% | -21.15% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.29% | -23.77% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.11% | -23.77% | -24.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -13.29% | +11.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -12.16% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 8.80% | -6.34% |
Volatility
DFIVX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) is 4.48%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that DFIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIVX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 6.99% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 15.01% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 18.78% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 17.82% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.05% | -1.04% |
Dividends
DFIVX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
DFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio | 3.77% | 4.21% | 3.94% | 4.40% | 3.78% | 4.37% | 2.42% | 3.70% | 6.60% | 2.85% | 3.36% | 3.45% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIVX and PG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to DFIVX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIVX dropped -66.61% vs PG's -54.25%.
DFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIVX and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer