DFIVX vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DFIVX (DFA International Value Portfolio) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both funds - DFIVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, DFIVX returned 13.59%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFIVX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFIVX having a 10.28% return and DBMF slightly higher at 10.45%.

DFIVX

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 13.96%
• 1Y: 33.30%
• 3Y*: 23.24%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

DBMF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 12.63%
• 1Y: 29.05%
• 3Y*: 10.02%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio	10.28%	45.24%	6.87%	17.83%	-3.51%	18.57%	-2.13%	6.47%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.45%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIVX and DBMF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.17

Over the past year, DFIVX and DBMF have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

DFIVX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIVX

DFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 72
DFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
DFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIVX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.36	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.08	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.50	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	4.78	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.92	17.53	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIVX and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIVX	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.36	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.63	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.75	-0.36

Drawdowns

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIVX drawdown since its inception was -66.61%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIVX and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIVX	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.61%	-20.39%	-46.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.58%	-6.10%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.39%	-15.60%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.29%	-20.39%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-1.75%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.24%	-6.58%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	1.66%	+0.77%

Volatility

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Value Portfolio (DFIVX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.94%. This indicates that DFIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIVX	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	2.94%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.19%	10.01%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	12.38%	+1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.32%	12.56%	+3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	12.43%	+5.60%

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIVX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFIVX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

DFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than DBMF's 5.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.18%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFIVX DFA International Value Portfolio	3.82%	4.21%	3.94%	4.40%	3.78%	4.37%	2.42%	3.70%	6.60%	2.85%	3.36%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIVX and DBMF in my portfolio?

DFIVX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIVX or DBMF?

DFIVX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to DBMF (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIVX dropped -66.61% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.