PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return.


DFIV

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
10.17%
6M
14.07%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
10.17%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and VTV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.74

The correlation between DFIV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
VTV

Financial Services

32.4%
22.3%

Energy

16.4%
8.1%

Basic Materials

10.9%
3.1%

Industrials

9.6%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
4.0%

Healthcare

4.9%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.3%

Technology

2.8%
13.4%

Utilities

2.5%
5.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.8%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
VTV
22.3%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
VTV
3.1%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
VTV
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
VTV
4.0%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
VTV
9.4%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
VTV
3.3%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
VTV
13.4%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
VTV
5.2%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
VTV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.03

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.05

15.20

-2.16

DFIV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.52

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.51

+0.40

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-59.27%

+33.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-6.35%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-14.52%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-1.11%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-7.87%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

1.68%

+0.82%

Volatility

DFIV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

2.65%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

7.67%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

10.18%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

13.89%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

16.68%

-0.03%

DFIV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.59%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIV and VTV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 17.72% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer