DFIV vs. VTV
DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. DFIV is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.03%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for VTV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
DFIV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 11.91% return.
DFIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
DFIV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 10.17% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and VTV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DFIV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIV
VTV
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIV
VTV
Energy
DFIV
VTV
Basic Materials
DFIV
VTV
Industrials
DFIV
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
DFIV
VTV
Healthcare
DFIV
VTV
Consumer Defensive
DFIV
VTV
Communication Services
DFIV
VTV
Technology
DFIV
VTV
Utilities
DFIV
VTV
Real Estate
DFIV
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
VTV
DFIV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 4.03 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 15.20 | -2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -59.27% | +33.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -6.35% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.72% | -14.52% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.11% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -7.87% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.68% | +0.82% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 2.65% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 7.67% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 10.18% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 13.89% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 16.68% | -0.03% |
DFIV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIV and VTV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 17.72% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 17.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIV and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer