DFIV vs. JIVE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and JIVE (Jpmorgan International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFIV returned 34.88% vs 42.79% for JIVE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for JIVE.

Performance

DFIV vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than JIVE's 15.75% return.

DFIV

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 15.41%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 23.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JIVE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 15.75%
• 6M: 20.07%
• 1Y: 42.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	11.54%	45.36%	7.26%	3.28%
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	15.75%	49.80%	11.22%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and JIVE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.94

The correlation between DFIV and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. JIVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFIV	JIVE
Financial Services	32.4%	33.4%
Energy	16.4%	8.9%
Basic Materials	10.9%	5.4%
Industrials	9.6%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	4.3%
Healthcare	4.9%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	3.7%
Communication Services	4.2%	2.8%
Technology	2.8%	6.9%
Utilities	2.5%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.3%

Return for Risk

DFIV vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 75
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 73

JIVE

JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 83
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIV	JIVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.98	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.91	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.53	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	4.07	-0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	15.74	-1.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIV vs. JIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the JIVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and JIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIV	JIVE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.98	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	2.01	-1.07

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and JIVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIV	JIVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-13.79%	-11.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-10.57%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-1.02%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-1.96%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.73%	-0.24%

Volatility

DFIV vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 3.89%, while Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIV	JIVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	4.93%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.99%	11.99%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.69%	14.46%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	14.97%	+1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	14.97%	+1.66%

DFIV vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFIV vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than JIVE's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.55%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	2.48%	2.88%	2.48%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIV and JIVE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DFIV and JIVE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFIV or JIVE?

JIVE has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs JIVE's -13.79%.

Which ETF is better, DFIV or JIVE?

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 42.79% vs 34.88% for DFIV. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFIV or JIVE?

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 42.79% return vs 34.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFIV or JIVE?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFIV or JIVE?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.48% for JIVE.

What is the main difference between DFIV and JIVE?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.55% for JIVE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.