DFISX vs. MIDLX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX).
DFISX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996. MIDLX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-US Small Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012.
Performance
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 1.00% | 36.35% | 3.76% | 14.46% | -17.13% | 10.71% | 9.27% | 24.18% | -19.42% | 24.78% |
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | -1.87% | 17.03% | 3.33% | 13.21% | -18.52% | 5.17% | 10.15% | 24.97% | -10.29% | 30.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFISX achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than MIDLX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, DFISX has outperformed MIDLX with an annualized return of 7.99%, while MIDLX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.30% annualized return.
DFISX
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
MIDLX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFISX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDLX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFISX vs. MIDLX — Risk / Return Rank
DFISX
MIDLX
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFISX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 0.98 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 1.32 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 0.92 | +1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 3.46 | +5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFISX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.98 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.20 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFISX and MIDLX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Dividend Comparison
DFISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than MIDLX's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 3.11% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 3.01% | 3.51% | 3.06% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 7.74% | 1.27% | 4.44% | 4.47% |
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | 3.44% | 3.37% | 10.08% | 4.21% | 5.85% | 5.19% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 6.82% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFISX drawdown since its inception was -60.66%, which is greater than MIDLX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFISX and MIDLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFISX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.66% | -34.70% | -25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -11.75% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.06% | -33.58% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | -34.70% | -8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.09% | -9.75% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -6.96% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.12% | -0.07% |
Volatility
DFISX vs. MIDLX - Volatility Comparison
DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) at 5.67%. This indicates that DFISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFISX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 5.67% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 8.48% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 12.28% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 13.09% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 13.93% | +2.20% |