DFIS vs. FHLC

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DFIS (Dimensional International Small Cap ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. DFIS is actively managed, while FHLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIS returned 18.52%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for FHLC. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.

Performance

DFIS vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's 0.03% return.

DFIS

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 12.14%
• 1Y: 26.57%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FHLC

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 5.86%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.58%
• 1Y: 16.58%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 4.76%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIS vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF	10.06%	37.49%	3.80%	15.19%	-12.50%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	0.03%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIS and FHLC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.52

The correlation between DFIS and FHLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIS vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFIS	FHLC
Industrials	24.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	14.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	-
Financial Services	11.7%	0.0%
Technology	9.8%	0.0%
Energy	5.6%	-
Healthcare	5.3%	99.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Communication Services	3.7%	-
Real Estate	3.5%	-
Utilities	3.2%	-

Return for Risk

DFIS vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIS

DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 53
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 34
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIS vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFIS	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.09	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.72	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.55	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.69	3.86	+3.83

DFIS vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIS and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFIS vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum FHLC drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIS	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-28.76%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.44%	-10.38%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.55%	-16.87%	+3.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-3.15%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-5.19%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	4.16%	-0.89%

Volatility

DFIS vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.87%. This indicates that DFIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIS	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	4.87%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.66%	10.50%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	14.69%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.37%	15.02%	+2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	16.84%	+0.53%

DFIS vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFIS vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FHLC's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF	2.02%	2.23%	2.19%	2.36%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.37%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIS and FHLC in my portfolio?

DFIS and FHLC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIS or FHLC?

DFIS has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FHLC (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which ETF is better, DFIS or FHLC?

On 3-year performance, DFIS leads with 18.52% vs 7.18% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFIS or FHLC?

Over the 3-year period, DFIS has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFIS or FHLC?

FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFIS or FHLC?

DFIS has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.37% for FHLC.

What is the main difference between DFIS and FHLC?

DFIS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FHLC is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFIS and 0.08% for FHLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.