PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIP vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIP vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFIP having a 0.83% return and VTP slightly higher at 0.86%.


DFIP

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.71%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
10Y*

VTP

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.62%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.86%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIP vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFIP and VTP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.96

The correlation between DFIP and VTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIP vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIP
DFIP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DFIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIP vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIPVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.66

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

4.69

-0.61

DFIP vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the VTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIP and VTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFIP vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIP drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIP and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIPVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-1.92%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-1.92%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.97%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-0.53%

-6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.68%

+0.05%

Volatility

DFIP vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) at 1.19%. This indicates that DFIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIPVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.19%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.47%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

3.35%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

3.33%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

3.33%

+3.42%

DFIP vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIP has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIP vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

DFIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than VTP's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
4.66%4.70%3.69%3.68%5.97%0.56%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.98%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DFIP and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFIP has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VTP (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIP dropped -14.96% vs VTP's -1.92%.

On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 3.18% vs 2.97% for DFIP. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 3.18% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for DFIP.

DFIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for DFIP and 0.05% for VTP.

VTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIP and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer