DFII vs. WEEK
DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and WEEK (Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFII is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while WEEK is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFII returned -37.26% vs 3.81% for WEEK. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for WEEK.
Performance
DFII vs. WEEK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than WEEK's 1.44% return.
DFII
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -17.17%
- YTD
- -24.78%
- 6M
- -28.08%
- 1Y
- -37.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEEK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFII vs. WEEK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | -24.78% | 5.61% |
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 1.44% | 3.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFII and WEEK is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFII vs. WEEK — Risk / Return Rank
DFII
WEEK
DFII vs. WEEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFII | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 4.65 | -3.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 29.49 | -30.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 263.82 | -265.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFII | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 9.29 | -10.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 10.05 | -10.49 |
Drawdowns
DFII vs. WEEK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than WEEK's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and WEEK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFII | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -0.13% | -47.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.07% | -0.13% | -47.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.95% | 0.00% | -45.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.01% | -0.01% | -19.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.04% | 0.01% | +27.03% |
Volatility
DFII vs. WEEK - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) at 0.07%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFII | WEEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 0.07% | +8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.27% | 0.25% | +33.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.33% | 0.41% | +40.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 0.39% | +40.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 0.39% | +40.69% |
DFII vs. WEEK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than WEEK's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFII vs. WEEK - Dividend Comparison
DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than WEEK's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | 27.87% | 15.51% |
WEEK Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 3.72% | 3.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFII and WEEK have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFII has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to WEEK (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs WEEK's -0.13%.
On 1-year performance, WEEK leads with 3.81% vs -37.26% for DFII. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WEEK has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -37.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.
DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 3.72% for WEEK.
DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while WEEK is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.19% for WEEK.
WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFII and WEEK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer