PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIGX vs. DFQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIGX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than DFQTX's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIGX has underperformed DFQTX with an annualized return of 0.83%, while DFQTX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


DFIGX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
0.83%

DFQTX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.64%
6M
12.56%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
0.07%6.33%0.47%4.58%-13.12%-3.14%9.10%7.22%0.92%1.65%
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
11.64%15.99%20.27%21.88%-14.21%28.46%15.72%29.41%-9.65%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIGX and DFQTX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2005

-0.25

The correlation between DFIGX and DFQTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIGX vs. DFQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIGX
DFIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DFIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

DFQTX
DFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIGXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

2.59

-1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

3.65

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.46

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

3.46

-2.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.47

15.22

-11.75

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the DFQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIGX and DFQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIGXDFQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.59

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.73

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.77

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.51

+0.48

Drawdowns

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum DFQTX drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIGX and DFQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIGXDFQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-59.35%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-8.47%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-19.71%

+14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-22.64%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.56%

-37.21%

+17.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

0.00%

-7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-7.78%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.92%

-0.88%

Volatility

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) is 1.29%, while DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I (DFQTX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that DFIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIGXDFQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

2.93%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

8.90%

-6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

11.69%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

16.99%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

18.27%

-12.91%

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DFQTX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIGX vs. DFQTX - Dividend Comparison

DFIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than DFQTX's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
2.30%2.22%2.82%2.33%1.78%2.36%4.14%2.16%2.19%1.57%1.66%2.49%
DFQTX
DFA US Core Equity 2 Portfolio I
0.96%1.06%1.15%1.74%4.43%4.74%1.29%3.50%2.84%1.97%1.80%3.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIGX and DFQTX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFQTX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to DFIGX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIGX dropped -19.56% vs DFQTX's -59.35%.

DFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIGX and DFQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer