PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIGX vs. MWTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIGX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than MWTIX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIGX has underperformed MWTIX with an annualized return of 0.83%, while MWTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.63% annualized return.


DFIGX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3.52%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
0.83%

MWTIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.27%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
0.07%6.33%0.47%4.58%-13.12%-3.14%9.10%7.22%0.92%1.65%
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
0.24%7.51%0.77%6.02%-15.49%-1.32%9.00%9.10%0.36%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIGX and MWTIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2000

0.82

The correlation between DFIGX and MWTIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIGX vs. MWTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIGX
DFIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DFIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MWTIX
MWTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MWTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MWTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) and Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIGXMWTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

1.20

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.81

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.67

-0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.47

5.08

-1.61

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the MWTIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIGX and MWTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIGXMWTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.20

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

-0.06

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.31

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.92

+0.06

Drawdowns

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIGX drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, roughly equal to the maximum MWTIX drawdown of -20.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIGX and MWTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIGXMWTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-20.58%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-3.34%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-7.09%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-20.51%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.56%

-20.58%

+1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.31%

-3.98%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-2.77%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.10%

-0.06%

Volatility

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIGX) is 1.29%, while Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I (MWTIX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that DFIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIGXMWTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.54%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

3.20%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

4.41%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.23%

6.64%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.33%

+0.03%

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MWTIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIGX vs. MWTIX - Dividend Comparison

DFIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than MWTIX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIGX
DFA Intermediate Government Fixed Income Portfolio
2.30%2.22%2.82%2.33%1.78%2.36%4.14%2.16%2.19%1.57%1.66%2.49%
MWTIX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I
4.06%3.89%4.38%4.11%2.08%1.12%6.48%3.61%2.91%2.14%3.35%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIGX and MWTIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWTIX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to DFIGX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIGX dropped -19.56% vs MWTIX's -20.58%.

MWTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIGX and MWTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer