DFIC vs. IFLO
DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, DFIC returned 24.59% vs 33.19% for IFLO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIC charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
DFIC vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.60% return.
DFIC
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.49% | 14.69% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 18.60% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIC and IFLO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DFIC and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIC vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIC
IFLO
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIC
IFLO
Industrials
DFIC
IFLO
Basic Materials
DFIC
IFLO
Consumer Cyclical
DFIC
IFLO
Technology
DFIC
IFLO
Energy
DFIC
IFLO
Healthcare
DFIC
IFLO
Consumer Defensive
DFIC
IFLO
Communication Services
DFIC
IFLO
Utilities
DFIC
IFLO
Real Estate
DFIC
IFLO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIC vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
DFIC
IFLO
DFIC vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 5.18 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 17.40 | -8.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFIC vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -6.44% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -6.44% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.99% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -1.29% | -3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.91% | +0.90% |
Volatility
DFIC vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.21%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIC | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 3.21% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 12.02% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.40% | 14.56% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 14.53% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 14.53% | +1.65% |
DFIC vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIC has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFIC vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.41% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, DFIC and IFLO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFIC has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to IFLO (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs IFLO's -6.44%.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.19% vs 24.59% for DFIC. On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.19% return vs 24.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIC is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFIC and 0.56% for IFLO.
IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIC and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer