PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIC vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIC vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


DFIC

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.87%
YTD
10.29%
6M
13.30%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIC vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
10.29%37.09%4.10%17.32%-9.27%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIC and DBE is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.11

The correlation between DFIC and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIC vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIC
DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIC vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFICDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

5.89

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

11.53

-1.63

DFIC vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIC and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFICDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.43

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.09

+0.72

Drawdowns

DFIC vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFICDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-86.69%

+62.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-14.41%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-23.89%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-30.27%

+28.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-57.31%

+52.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

7.35%

-4.59%

Volatility

DFIC vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) is 4.34%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that DFIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFICDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

12.95%

-8.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

30.86%

-19.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

34.97%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

29.39%

-13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

28.33%

-12.12%

DFIC vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIC vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
2.27%2.54%2.87%2.55%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIC and DBE have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to DFIC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 23.42% vs 19.43% for DFIC. On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, DFIC has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 19.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

DFIC is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIC and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer